logo
  • Entries
  • Comment
Recent Posts
  • Running a Project Status Meeting
  • Project Breathalyzer
  • More conversation about Dick’s adventures
  • See Dick jump, see Dick rant
Recent Comments
  • Business / cons… in Shopping for the first day - clothi…
  • Abraham Canale in Could the C-Suite Be More Like Majo…
  • James in Fixing the Flaw in the IT Oversight…
  • Bil Brasington in Brasington's Laws
  • Home
  • My Books
  • International
  • Introspect
  • Process
  • Sponge
  • Strategy
  • Tactics

 Volatility Fails as a Proxy for Risk

icon1 Posted in Introspect on 07 29th, 2010 | your response

“volatility per se, be it related to weather, timing of the morning newspaper, is simply a benign statistical probability factor that tells us nothing about risk until it is coupled with a consequence,” – Robert H. Jeffrey, “A New Paradigm for Risk,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Volume 11, Number 1 (Fall), pp. 33-40.

When we speak about capturing ranges of duration or cost, or speak about compliance with technical performance measures and do not speak about the consequences, then we're pretty much wasting our time with Risk Management.

Here's The Core Problem(s)

  • When capturing the estimates using what every method you choose – I'd recommend NOT asking the estimator the Hi, Most Likely, and Lo for lots of reasons discussed else where – more information is needed than just the numbers.
  • After eliciting the ranges of values, the probability distributions can then be used to drive a Monte Carlo simulator. This approach produces a Credible forecast of the probability of completing On or Before a Date or having the project cost A Value or Less.
  • When static 3 point estimates are used, there can be up to a 27% unfavorable (under estimating) of the completion date. So don't use 3 points and don't use PERT.
  • There is a whole cottage industry on why the PERT formulas are bogus and the problems with them. Here's a start “Why PERT Has Problems.”

For places to look for PERT background start with:

[1] “Quantitative Risk Analysis for Project Management,: A Critical
Review,” Lionel Galway, Rand Working Paper, WR-112-RC, February 2004.
[2]
“The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success
in Government,” Harvey M. Sapolsky, Harvard University Press, 1972.
[3]
“PERT Completion Times Revisited,” Ted Williams, University of
Michigan-Flint, School of Management, Working Paper 2005-02, September
2005.
[4] “Hidden Assumptions in Project Management Tools,” Dr. Eva
Reginier, DRMI Newsletter, January 10, 2006, Naval Postgraduate School,
Monterey CA.
[5] “Activity Completion Times in PERT and Scheduling
Network Simulation,” Dr. Eva Reginier, DRMI Newsletter, April 8, 2005,
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterrey CA.

   Volatility Fails as a Proxy for Risk

Herding Cats @ Herding CatsSource: Herding Cats

    The Power of Simplicity

    Business Lessons From Baseball Part 5

Twitter Twists

Related Videos

    Google Video Search on slugs: business management
    Loading...

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Translator

Subscription Options:



 

TicketNetwork - NCAA

RSS Jacco Fashion*

  • Joyful Sheer Blossom Rose 3/4 Sleeved Cropped Open Cardigan 2 Colors February 8, 2012
  • Elegant Sweetheart Pleated Rose Trim Evening Spagetti Strap Dress 3 Colors February 8, 2012
  • Classic Funnel Neck Wool Blend Camel Trench Cape Coat February 8, 2012
  • Stylish One Button Collar Asymmetrical Wool Blend Camel Loose Poncho Cape Coat February 7, 2012
  • Mature Lady Cutout Flower Lace Open Cardigan Shift Dress 2 Colors February 7, 2012
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
© 2008-2010 ChowYING.com | Privacy | Site Map | About Me Site serviced by allQoo.com